Wednesday, March 28, 2007

I like the earth

Poor earth. Lately, the earth seems to be an unwitting child caught in the middle of a custody hearing. It has two groups attempting to define its right to life and to take control of its future. The people of the world are mired in a vitriolic debate about the state of the planet and its' destiny, whether man is having a negative impact on the environment, whether we're seeing a climatic cycle that has happened countless times in the past, and what might be needed to be done to save the human race from destroying itself.

In this struggle over what to do (or not) about the situation before us, there are inherently two types of people: Those who foresee an indefinite, never ending future of human occupation of this planet, and those who believe in the temporary lifespan of this planet, with an undeniable and violent "ending" that is certain to come. These two polarized groups, by their own admission, seem to break down, generally, into liberals and conservatives, or non-believers and believers. In essence, the first group puts their entire trust and hope in the planet itself, at times even worshipping it (her), since they have no unified belief in a non-earth existence. The second group, the believers, place the earth (in its present, "mortal" state) in a context of being a temporary residence with a specific and fleeting function dictated by God. In fact, they say, ancient prophets and scripture promise that during the last days of this earth as we know it, “the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven …” (Mal. 4:1) and that "the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground," among other disasters including floods, earthquakes, war, famines, pollution and desolating sickness. In other words: Why worry about recycling? The earth is going to be completely altered. It's prophesied.

Thus, the impasse we seem to be experiencing between the two main groups and their very diverse outlooks on the purpose of the planet. I read recently that if the two main "camps" of conservative Christians and environmentalists could sit down and talk, many good things in life could be accomplished. The author purported that Christians generally aren't interested in the environment and that the environmentalists do not take the naive Christian outlook seriously, and therefore there's no constructive communication between the two groups. In fact, both groups seem to be receding further into their silos.

Here's the problem: The people who supposedly understand the intricacies of our planet cannot agree on what seems to be happening to the planet. Scientists on both sides are weighing in, with some supporting the idea that global warming is real and the others that it is a complete farce. This discussion has been going on for several decades at least, but was brought to a head with the recent bleak report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Physical Science Basis of Climate Change, and the release of Al Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth," which purports that global warming is real, that the climate of the earth is changing dramatically, and that man is the main cause mainly through CO2 emissions. Is what we're seeing, as Mr. Gore states, dramatically worse than any previous climate event, or is it simply a natural cycle that has manifested itself in the distant past in events such as ice ages or warming periods? James Lovelock, a renowned environmental scientist, went so far as to say that "Before this century is over, billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic."

Through my lens, the components of our beautiful planet were organized by Jesus Christ with God's authority and direction. It is the greatest of all functional works of art. Wonderful and beautiful plants and creatures were placed upon it, amidst great rivers and mountains. In fact, the first inhabitants were placed in a lush garden in Eden and were instructed to "dress and to keep it." What a wonderful gift, and I think if we just considered all of the "dimensions" to this planet, we might be a little more careful.
The earth has a spirit in it just as our physical bodies have spirits in them. Elder Parley P. Pratt wrote that the spirit world “is here on the very planet where we were born; or in other words, the earth and other planets of like sphere, have their inward or spiritual spheres, as well as their outward, or temporal. The one is peopled by temporal tabernacles, and the other by spirits. A veil is drawn between the one sphere and the other, whereby all the objects in the spiritual sphere are rendered invisible to those in the temporal.”
Key to Theology, 9th ed., Deseret Book, 1965, pp. 126–27.
In my mind, I liken the earth to one of our church meetinghouses. We didn't build it. It was provided by God through the church leadership and sacrifice of the members, but we're expected to be a steward of it, by keeping it clean and respecting it as a necessary structure. It is temporary, but we treat it with reverence, as we don't want to walk around in filth and clutter. We know that others come behind us who will need to use it. We should have the same outlook on the earth. It has a finite life span in its present state, but do we want to continue to contribute to the expanding pollution in the air and water, for instance? Are we actually in favor of our children inheriting ever worse air and water? Well, if it's prophesied to happen, why fight it?

I believe we have a responsibility to this earth, the gift that we've been given for our short time here. I also believe that as humans, we have always found better ways to do things and we call that progress.

What is the use in ridiculing Al Gore, a man trying his hardest to "save" the planet? Certainly, the part of the movie that infers that the earth wouldn't be in this dire strait had he not been robbed of the election in 2000 was irrational, as well as the not-so-subtle calls for population control. I think he is genuine. Unfortunately, he doesn't have the whole picture.

Certainly, scientists today are doing their best with an extremely limited amount of information, considering that countless other worlds have gone through this same process and countless more will (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, 14:71–72). Many times, secular scientists, come at the situation of the world so differently than believers that it seems very hard to find common ground.
As Latter-day Saints we do not throw out the Genesis story—as so many secularists have done—nor do we regard scientists’ honest efforts to learn the truth as the work of the Adversary (though the Adversary does, of course, use those views to fulfill his ends). Instead, we would do better to wait patiently with faith in the scriptures until the Lord fulfills his promise to reveal at the beginning of the Millennium, “things which have passed, … things of the earth, by which it was made,” which, we are assured, will still be part of the “hidden things which no man knew” (D&C 101:32–33). Once the truth is known, all conflicts arising from part truths will vanish. In the meantime, scientists (including many Latter-day Saints) can continue to supply us with helpful knowledge about our present, mortal sphere, or even with ideas about how things might have occurred in the past if the processes under consideration really were uniform over the necessary length of time.
The Gospel and the Scientific View: How Earth Came to Be, Assistant Professor of the history of science (BYU) F. Kent Nielsen, Ensign, Sept. 1980
I wonder what we as humans stand to lose by not attempting to use new technologies and keep the environment as clean as possible. Why the vehement reaction of the conservative talk show hosts, their followers and many adherents to religion? Do many of the religious people regard worrying about the environment as a waste of time or money? If anything, exploring and utilizing new renewable technologies would decrease our dependence on foreign oil sources and decrease our slavish reliance on global petroleum corporations with their ever increasing profits. I believe that, during the creation, geologic events were set into motion to provide the oil for our uses. I also believe that the telegraph fostered unimaginable communication opportunities for people in the 19th Century, but that newer, faster technologies have since been adopted. I think solar and wind power generation look very interesting. Tesco, a British retail chain and competitor to Wal-Mart, is opening their first "big box" store in the U.S. (in California). They're sticking 500,000 square feet of solar panels on top of it. What's wrong with that? Imagine southern California with completely clear air.

Is it CO2 that is getting caught in the atmosphere in numbers too large that is causing global warming? Is it man and his machines causing glaciers and the Arctic ice to melt? It's hard to tell, as even the scientists do not seem to agree. One thing is certain: I do not and cannot know of myself. What seems clear is that the frequency and strength of destructive weather patterns does seem to be worsening, as prophesied. Consider this statement by Elder M. Russell Ballard of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, in 1996:
“For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places” (Matt. 24:5–7).

Some of these things seem to be occurring with ever-increasing regularity. If we measured the natural disasters that have occurred in the world during the past 10 years and plotted that year by year, we would see an acceleration. The earth is rumbling, and earthquakes are occurring in “divers places.” Human nature being what it is, we don’t normally pay much attention to these natural phenomena until they happen close to where we are living. But when we contemplate what has happened during the past decade, not only with earthquakes but also with regard to hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, volcanic eruptions, and the like, we see an accelerating pattern,"
When Shall These Things Be?, Elder M. Russell Ballard Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, Ensign, Dec. 1996
Whoever or whatever the cause, the earth is undergoing changes, and things are getting worse.
These signs of the Second Coming are all around us and seem to be increasing in frequency and intensity. For example, the list of major earthquakes in The World Almanac and Book of Facts, 2004 shows twice as many earthquakes in the decades of the 1980s and 1990s as in the two preceding decades (pp. 189–90). It also shows further sharp increases in the first several years of this century. The list of notable floods and tidal waves and the list of hurricanes, typhoons, and blizzards worldwide show similar increases in recent years (pp. 188–89). Increases by comparison with 50 years ago can be dismissed as changes in reporting criteria, but the accelerating pattern of natural disasters in the last few decades is ominous.
Preparation for the Second Coming, Dallin H. Oaks of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, Ensign, May 2004, 7
What's causing it all? We see that these signs of the "end of the world" are going to happen, and why is it beyond the realm of possibility that man is the cause? Ezra Taft Benson, before he was prophet, acknowledged that man will partly be to blame:
In Matthew, chapter 24, we learn of “famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes. …” (Matt. 24:7.) The Lord declared that these and other calamities shall occur. These particular prophecies seem not to be conditional. The Lord, with his foreknowledge, knows that they will happen. Some will come about through man’s manipulations; others through the forces of nature and nature’s God, but that they will come seems certain. Prophecy is but history in reverse—a divine disclosure of future events.
Prepare Ye, Ezra Taft Benson, Ensign, Jan 1974, 68
After I viewed "An Inconvenient Truth," I felt very moved and felt inspired to prepare myself and my family to be ready for the adversity that lies in the (near?) future. Is the science in that movie truth? I have no way of knowing. Movies such as this can help inspire us to do two things: Prepare for what lies ahead and to do our minor part in tending to this wonderful gift our Father in Heaven has loaned us. Why not seek truth from wherever we can find it, as we in the church are fond of saying? Do we stop preaching conservative values in regard to traditional marriage, for instance, when we have revelations telling us that many in the last days will be wicked? We should be spurred into action when we hear of or see cataclysmic environmental events around the world, whether related by general authorities or other interested people. Why ridicule Al Gore? Because he's of a different party?

We are in the "eleventh hour" and we're seeing the signs of fear, which interestingly, seem to be part of the plan. We earthlings tend to forget about our Heavenly Father when all goes well.
These huge catastrophes [earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes] are tragedies, but they may have another significance. The Lord uses adversities to send messages to his children. Isaiah prophesied that in the last days the Lord would visit all nations with great natural disasters (see Isa. 29:6; 2 Ne. 27:1–2). In modern revelation, the Lord speaks of calling upon the nations of the earth by the mouth of his servants and also “by the voice of thunderings, and by the voice of lightnings, and by the voice of tempests, and by the voice of earthquakes, and great hailstorms, and by the voice of famines and pestilences of every kind” (D&C 43:25). In another revelation, the Lord tells those he has called to teach the gospel:

“After your testimony cometh the testimony of earthquakes, …

“And also cometh the testimony of the voice of thunderings, and the voice of lightnings, and the voice of tempests, and the voice of the waves of the sea heaving themselves beyond their bounds.

“And all things shall be in commotion; and surely, men’s hearts shall fail them; for fear shall come upon all people” (D&C 88:89–91). "
Adversity, Dallin H. Oaks, Ensign, Jul 1998, 7
Some will humble themselves and turn to the Lord as a result of the changing earth, while others will harden their hearts and continue to curse their fellow humans for destroying the earth.

I do not think we as Christians should show blind allegiance to political parties or "the way we've always done it." We should consider people around the world who could possibly be affected by our use of non-renewable resources. Why not? It sounds Christ-like to me. For all the joking about that WWJD (What Would Jesus Drive) group, it's actually an interesting little tidbit in this whole saga.

This next quote is lengthy, but makes a wonderful point about looking outwards in regards to the community around us and pitching in.
President Hinckley said, “Where there is stark hunger, regardless of the cause, I will not let political considerations dull my sense of mercy or thwart my responsibility to the sons and daughters of God, wherever they may be or whatever their circumstances.” (Ensign, May 1985, p. 54.)

As Church members read accounts or see graphic pictures of human suffering, they are touched and ask, “What can we do?” Most of us will not be in a position to help on a person-to-person basis when the need is many miles away. However, every member of the Church can pray for peace throughout the world and for the well-being of all its inhabitants. Also, members may fast and increase their fast offerings when they are able and thus enable the Church to do more.

As far as person-to-person assistance is concerned, the greatest compassionate service each of us can give may be in our own neighborhoods and communities. Wherever we live in the world there is pain and sorrow all around us. We need to take more initiative as individuals in deciding how we can best be of service.

The fact that a particular activity is not sponsored by the Church does not mean it is not worthy of a Church member’s support. As individuals, we should become knowledgeable of the opportunities around us. I fear some members suffer from action paralysis, waiting for the Church to put its stamp of approval on one organization or another. The Church teaches principles. Use those principles and the Spirit to decide which organizations you would like to support.

The Lord said, “Verily I say, men should be anxiously engaged in a good cause, and do many things of their own free will.” (D&C 58:27.) Good things can be done through the Church organization, community organizations, and very often through no formal organization at all.

We must reach out beyond the walls of our own church. In humanitarian work, as in other areas of the gospel, we cannot become the salt of the earth if we stay in one lump in the cultural halls of our beautiful meetinghouses. We need not wait for a call or an assignment from a Church leader before we become involved in activities that are best carried out on a community or individual basis.
A Thousand Times, Glenn L. Pace, Ensign, Nov 1990, 8
While not speaking specifically of environmental causes, surely such could be discussed. Recently, I was called a "tree hugger," as I was complaining about a new development being put in next door to my house. I've never hugged a tree. I'm not sure I've even shaken hands with one. In fact, I've been known to burn pieces of trees in my fireplace and print things out on really flat pieces of trees. I recycle whatever I can and I'm interested in adopting any renewable styles of living. Tree hugger. It's all relative.

For clarity to those not a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the earth is more crucial to human existence than possibly imagined. A long time ago, it was organized by Jesus Christ and others, under authority and direction of God the Father, from some type of existing materials in space. It's purpose and existence is eternal. It is here to provide a place for all people to abide during their mortal existence as they learn to distinguish between good and evil, and hopefully choose to follow God's teachings. At a certain time in the "latter days," prior to and during Christ's return, the earth will go through major changes, including the calamities mentioned above, as well as all continents regrouping into one solid land mass, the mountains being flattened and the planet's literal coordinates in the heavens changed. Eventually, at the end of the 1,000-year period of peace (Millennium), this earth will even be turned into an "orb of glass" that will become the Celestial Kingdom, where the righteous will dwell in eternity. So to think that we do not have a respect for the planet would be unthinkable. Orson Pratt pointed out that we as people would do well use the "life stages" of the earth itself as an example:
“Who, in looking upon the earth as it ascends in the scale of the universe, does not desire to keep pace with it? … O man, remember the future destiny and glory of the earth, and secure thine everlasting inheritance upon the same, that when it shall be glorious, thou shalt be glorious also”
Orson Pratt, in Journal of Discourses, 1:333–34
To review and conclude this lengthy brain dump: Signs of the "last days" appear to be happening as prophesied. General authorities of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and some scientists and politicians agree that the earth is going through, and will undergo major changes. The photographic and other evidence seems to indicate it. Ancient and modern scripture declare an end to the world in its present state. Is man the cause? Is man the partial cause? Are the climate changes cyclical? Is there anything we could do about it? is there anything we should do about it at this point? My answer at this point is why not just accept the genuine attempts being made to keep the earth clean, stop the ridiculing and pitch in a little. Let's be good examples and stewards.

I'm very interested in gathering some comments, so please add your thoughts below. Stay calm.

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Happy 2007 and "God Bless You!"

Happy 2007 and "God Bless You!"

There -- I've said it. And if I may, I'd like to extend my One holy benediction into the entire year. Let's just call it my "God Bless You" of 2007. It will be omnipresent and will descend on you from on high every time you sneeze, though I may be far away.

And, if I may, I'd like to recognize my own "God Bless You" as a "God Bless Me" for all of my own future sneezes and therefore opt out of receiving the obligatory chorus of blessings from co-workers. I'm really doing everyone around me a favor in not having to take action every time I sneeze. I mean, my colleagues at work are busy; deep in thought carrying out their assignments and what right do I have to ask them to not only recognize every single sneeze I let out, but pronounce a blessing on me?

Now, I'm not one of those chronic sneezers who let one loose every time a butterfly lands on a flower in Africa. I don't sneeze any more than anyone else, and this is no more a malady for me than the average breather. But I do feel a sense of duty to those who would like to ignore our neighbor's sneeze and throw off the chains of guilt and repression. Enough is enough. Private sneezers of the world unite! Come out of the anti-sneezers closet and make yourself part of the movement.

Why don't we all burst into some type of chant for other bodily functions, like coughing or nose-blowing? Actually, I guess we do have a ritual for the burp. We nearly always comment negatively on a belch, don't we? Yet, is not the potentially sickly sneeze all the more dangerous than a burp? The sneeze is gushing out zillions of ripe germs into a shared molecule mushroom cloud, while with the burp is not only benign, but gives us and those around us a nostalgic revisiting of a good meal. "Mmm, garlic for lunch, eh?" But for some reason, the contagious sneeze not only does not elicit negative comments from the masses, but receives a heartfelt wish for a healthy life. A blessing. And the wisher always has a surprised look on their face like you've just exploded into the first sneeze they've ever beheld in their life and you're genuinely lucky to have survived it. "God Bless You! Oh, boy!"

I'm not sure of the origin of my sternutation stance. It may be due to my somewhat reclusive personality and how I don't like anyone to really notice anything I do, let alone a sudden outburst that has me roaring like a lion in the cereal aisle. One second I'm humming while searching for the generic Cinnamon Toast Crunch and the next has me bent over with the muscles in my abdomen, chest, diaphragm and vocal cords contracting like I'm possessed. Then, following the exodus of the tiny (and some not so tiny) particles at 100 miles per hour, I just want to move on with my life and forget it ever happened. But there's invariably someone there to pay attention to all that and then feel the need to comment on it.

And then comes the violently enforced "Thank You" for the blessing.

After humiliating myself in an obnoxious manner and wanting to sink into whatever I'm sitting on, I have to then thank the people that just blessed me. But I'm never thankful, that's the problem. Not only do I not feel grateful to them, but I'm annoyed at their noticing my sneeze and feeling the need to direct some attention to it.

At a past job, I worked in a room with about 15 people, all hidden in their own cubicles. Upon sneezing, someone would instantly hear the joyous refrain of "God Bless You!" from behind each false wall unit. People walking by would stick their head in "God Bless You!" My co-worker, sitting next to me was a self-professed pagan. Strangely, she never missed the post-sneeze opportunity to bless me in the name of the Lord. A blessing from people who aren't God or his direct representatives is bad enough, but from someone who doesn't believe in a single God? Would it be "Gods Bless You"? Or "The lichen and the moss send their regards"? I guess it should have been. But then, I was always forced to thank her and I nearly always had to leave the room to regain my composure.

I don't pretend to be God. Why should I pretend to have the power and authority to bless anyone who sneezes? How do I know they're worthy? After each sneeze, should I invite them into my cubicle, conduct an honest interview with them, and after finding them worthy, sanctify them? What happens if they're not worthy? Talk about an awkward situation... I'd probably just mumble an "I'm sorry" and ask them to retreat without a blessing. Maybe next sneeze.

For the most part, I don't have a minute-to-minute interest in someone's health. I'm trying to work and get my job done. When someone sneezes, I (the old me) would mumble "bless you..." just to appease the sneeze police and try to avert the stinkeye from those who realize I had the nerve not to say anything afterwards. You see, I just don't want to have to say it anymore, and I'm sick of being guilty when I don't.

The scenario I dread most is the multiple sneeze. How many consecutive sneezes do we need to acknowledge? Unfortunately, the going rate seems to be every last sneeze. Even those who support the sneeze response seem to waver after three or four, but they keep up without fail. It's like following someone through multiple doors - do you have to say "Thanks" for each one? Should they answer you back with a "You're welcome" or "Sure" for every single door?

And what about the ear-shatterers who seem to dredge up sneeze volume from ancient mythology? A quiet room can be thrown into absolute, instantaneous cacophony for a split second with a sneeze, like the person is being burned alive. Then a few sniffles and the ritual "blessings" begin. I always laughed at the "squeak" women but I've really come to admire them. They have the decency to maintain order in a public space.

At the beginning of 2008 I may say another one. I may even Web cast it so that sneezers all around the world can partake of my blessing. But for this year, I'm unburdening myself of having to say it every time and I declare my 2007 "God Bless You" to be effective for everyone, everywhere throughout the year. And to those of you of the "Gesundheit" and "Salute" schools - this message is for you, too. When I sneeze, be assured that my soul isn't escaping my body, my essence isn't issuing forth out of my mouth and my heart hasn't stopped. I'm just fine. Just wash your hands as soon as you can and let's all get back to work.

Monday, January 01, 2007

To You, the Morning Greeter

Good morning! How are the kids? What did you do last night? You look a little tired -- everything OK?

Whether at work or at home or even during vacations, I'm constantly the victim of morning terrorism. I get out of bed and let down my guard as I head to the bathroom or the kitchen and am instantly swarmed by well-wishers and detail questioners.

I don't understand the need to greet each other in the morning, as if we haven't seen each other since the war. Sometimes, it's as if we haven't spoken since college back in the 70s. But it's literally been about eight hours and I'm really tired and don't feel like communicating with anyone. Why do you? If we're at home or on an extended family vacation, we probably haven't even left a 20-foot radius of each other. In fact, we could probably hear each other snoring, and I think we bumped into each other in the hallway at some point during a bathroom trip in the night.

Understanding all of this, why, when I emerge from my room quietly and tiptoe stealthily towards the bathroom do you and everyone else pop out from around every corner and pepper me with questions about how I slept? Is it really that important to you? I laid my body on a big, soft rectangle and went into a non-awake state and emerged in the morning, all the while, I remind you, one room away. And thus it's only beginning...

When I get to work and attempt to make a line-drive to my desk to get straight into E-mail and the other main reasons I'm coming to this place, the work morning greetings are like a concentrated artillery barrage. A dozen "good morning!"s are about tolerable until the self-nominated office social leader comes in. "Hey, what's wrong? You look a little tired. Looks like someone didn't get enough sleep last night," or my favorite "Look what the cat dragged in," which elicits a wan "yeah" makes the questioner erupt into giggling "Wow - you really are tired!"

You know what? Leave me alone. I'll reciprocate with the base office banter at about 10:00 -- Let's make an appointment and I'll stop over at your cubicle and I can relate all that you've missed in my life since we parted yesterday at 5:00. We can discuss what sides I had with my meatloaf, what I read, what I saw on TV, what route I took to work, which level of the garage I parked on and whatever else you absolutely must know.

By the way, thanks for forcing me to eat that bagel, too, I hadn't thought to prepare myself a breakfast and I haven't eaten anything since yesterday morning when you brought the donuts.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Route 66 Restaurant Couple


Restaurant Couple
Originally uploaded by thapgood.
We ventured off the interstate into Shamrock, Texas and found this amazing Art Deco Conoco Tower Building. We ate lunch right across the street at the Western Motel and Restaurant and talked with this couple for awhile. He helped construct both the Route 66 as well as the newer Interstate 40 that supplanted much of the historic road. Both times we ventured off the interstate and out of the chain restaurant scene, we found an amazing depth of history and beauty.